Blog

The cost of routine follow-ups in a Scottish letting agency

Most Scottish letting agencies and property factors do not lose their week to one hard decision. They lose it to the same small jobs, again and again: chasing a contractor, chasing a landlord for approval, chasing a certificate that is due, chasing a tenant for access, then writing the update that says what happened.

None of those steps is dramatic. Together they are the cost of the routine.

What "routine" actually looks like

Take a fictional mid-sized Edinburgh agency managing a few hundred private lets. On a normal Tuesday the inbox holds:

1. A tenant asking when the plumber is coming.
2. A landlord who has not replied to Friday's approval request.
3. A gas safety certificate due next month on a property nobody has booked yet.
4. A contractor who said they would confirm access and has not.

Each item needs a short message, a note on the file, and a reminder to come back if nothing moves. The work is rule-based. An experienced colleague could write down how it is done. Yet in many offices it still depends on who is in, and who remembers.

That is the problem cost: staff time spent on follow-ups that the agency already knows how to handle, instead of on exceptions, complaints and the work only a person can judge.

Why Scotland makes the routine non-optional

Scottish letting agents are not inventing these steps for their own comfort. Where they manage repairs and related duties for landlords, the Letting Agent Code of Practice sets written expectations.

From Code section 5 (Management and maintenance):

mygov.scot summarises the same point for registration: lettings businesses must have written procedures for collecting rent, managing repairs and maintenance, ending tenancies, handling client money and handling complaints. The Scottish Association of Landlords publishes free model procedures to help firms meet that bar.

Property factors face a parallel shape of work: common repairs, owner approvals, contractor access and status updates across multiple owners. The names differ; the follow-up pattern does not.

This article is not legal advice and does not list every duty. It only notes that the Code already expects written procedures and records — so the operational question is whether your team can follow them without burning hours on memory and chasing.

Where the money goes (without inventing a magic number)

We are not going to invent "hours saved" or "£X per week" for a typical agency. Those numbers vary by portfolio size, software and how much of the process is already written down.

What we can say from public sources:

• Admin time has a cash cost. In the Scottish Government's Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment engagement on rented-sector reform (published 9 Oct 2024), respondents quoted letting-agent admin costs of £14 to £65 an hour in the personalisation section of the annex (respondent figures; not a government tariff, and not a measured average for chase emails). Even a few chase emails a day add up when you price the hour honestly.
• Agents themselves flag admin burden. The same BRIA annex records concern from letting agents about an "increased administrative burden" as rules stack up. That is qualitative evidence of pressure, not a measured average.

So the cost case is simple: every chase that could have been a scheduled step, or a draft from a written procedure, is billable staff time — and when communication slips, it is also dispute risk.

A one-week time audit (ops, not software)

Before buying anything, run a quiet audit. Pick five working days. For each chase or update, note:

1. Trigger — what arrived (tenant message, calendar reminder, contractor silence).
2. Rule — is there a written step for this, or does it live in someone's head?
3. Minutes — rough time to find context, write, send, log.
4. Outcome — resolved, or needs another chase later?

At the end of the week, sort the rows into:

• Repeatable — same shape every time; a template and a reminder would do.
• Judgement — needs a person (complaint, exception, money, legal weight).

The first pile is your problem cost. The second pile is what your team should keep.

Related reading on this site: Repair report first reply.

What "good" looks like once the process is written

Agencies that keep the routine under control tend to share three habits:

1. One written path per repeat job — first reply, landlord approval request, contractor chase, certificate reminder — with the trigger and what "done" means.
2. Templates in the agency's tone — so the newest colleague does not invent wording under pressure.
3. Follow-ups that do not depend on memory — a diary, a task list or a scheduled check that fires when the promised date arrives (Code para 93 territory).

That is know-how captured once, then reused. It is not a replacement for your people. It is how your people stop spending the afternoon on the same three emails.

Where Lorework fits

Lorework takes routine follow-ups and updates off the team: tenants and landlords chat in, Lorework sends information out by SMS, and staff approve before anything is sent. Your people stay responsible for decisions. First use case: letting agencies and property management in Scotland.

If you want to walk through one bottleneck — a repair chase loop, a landlord-approval path, or a compliance reminder calendar — book a short demo. Thirty minutes is enough to see whether the problem cost is one Lorework can take on.

FAQ

Sources